It is common knowledge here in the US that the liberal elites who have shoved mass immigration down our throats are simply following the plan to over populate and replace with secure lifetime voters. They, the elites, never have to deal with the consequences, of course. They move about in their protected bubbles, armed guards and walls around their estates. I am actually surprised that there hasn't been an uptick in covert vigilante activity. We have been conditioned to be at war with ourselves which is the craftiest way to decimate an entire civilization. The irony is - the elites in their ivory towers have no idea how the real world works.
I agree. Their strategy seems low cost. But it has cost them their connection to reality.
We saw that during Covid when the Canadian truckers brought Canada to a standstill. Many were shocked. They gave no thought to who delivered their food and medicines. They were just working class people.
Much more of this to come. I feel the same way about the AI apocalypse. Manual work will be unaffected. But the office dweller has much to fear.
Yes, which is why my youngest four grand kids - one girl, three boys, all rejected going to college. They are learning manual skills that keep the world running. Construction, HVAC electric, and real estate. As I have said before - without the ones who know how to keep the grid up AI has no life.
Some of the interviews with the low level bureaucrats in Ottawa were hilarious in a grim way. The truckers painfully explaining that they delivered their food. The bureaucrats insisting the truck drivers had no leverage because food came from the back of the grocery store, not trucks. 🤦🏻♀️
The goal is to create chaos, discomfort and crisis, that (as the narrative goes) only the elite, educated and worldly can "fix". This is their plan to bring about a one world government.
I think it is narcissism too. Their inner delusions are now projected outward. They tend towards the grandiose anyway. Net Zero is one such absurdity. It makes no sense even if it were possible.
But I agree they imagine they can ride the tiger they unleash.
It struck me as you were describing the narrative-management problem that a key piece of manipulative newspeak is to always refer to an atrocity in say Southport, London, Nottingham or Belfast as a "tragedy". As if it were just something very, very unfortunate. Nobody's fault. Brilliantly chosen word to divert and deflect any noticing of obvious culpability, as you have often spoken of. The problem of people noticing the obvious cause-and-effect in play for the last decade at least.
Great article and if the Liberal global criminals who govern us in the UK don't listen and keep calling us far right they can expect the country descending to a worse state than Bosnia at the height of their civil war. Sebrenica here we come.
There is a liberal solution to this problem: reciprocity.
Why should the UK or US take immigrants from countries that do not reciprocate? If Christianity is illegal in your country, you should not be allowed to immigrate to the West. If women are treated as chattel in your country, you should not be allowed to immigrate to the West. If your country refuses to take in its deportees, you should not be allowed to immigrate to the West.
Immigrants from MENA should be limited to genuine asylum cases which are basically the ethnic minorities being driven out by the Muslim majority (Coptic Christians, Druze, Yazidi).
I agree. None of this works. But it is not meant to. We are importing decades or centuries of strife. That is the purpose of it. To keep the show on the road.
Yes. The response of the chattering classes was to dismiss the US Government’s warnings as it is a Trump administration. But it is troubling what they observe.
I sincerely believe our leadership class are now unable to manage reality.
Stop Press News: Writing on his Truth Social platform, President Trump had just said: “Keir Starmer will resign as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. He failed badly on two very important subjects – IMMIGRATION AND ENERGY (OPEN NORTH SEA OIL!). I wish him well! President DJT.”
A very useful comment also aimed at Starmer’s successor and all UK Uniparty leaders.
"Our Uniparty politicians (UK and EU) were warned a year ago via the new USA National Security Strategy that they leading our countries towards “civilizational erasure”:"
The United States has no moral standing to tell others how to conduct their national affairs. They are one of the most screwed-up countries on the planet, second only to Israel.
I think the US has many problems, as has Trump. But he has repeatedly warned the UK in public about their ruinous policies. Trump has not succumbed to Green energy madness and he has tried to reverse illegal immigration and even tackled DEI. The British establishment have embraced all of the above.
Many here welcomed comments by Trump and Vance. I would also add both men seemed sincere too in their concerns about the direction the British government was taking.
I think you are having a problem understanding reality, despite how you refer to yourself. Or else, you’ve not ventured forth from your entitled, elite enclave in a very long time, if ever.
Another thing - what media et al does by telling stories is, they get you to accept their definition of the situation.
Look at the picture of the people holding the banner saying "Illegal migration is destroying our civilisation", it's a perfect example of someone's conditoning kicking in and effecting crimestop. In reality, migration is what is destroying civilisation.
Some points, if you pardon me going into lecturing-hectoring mode:
1) If the legal status of the migrant(s) is the issue, all it takes is a few strokes of a pen at no. 10 and suddenly the problem is gone, since the formerly illegal migrants are now legal. But for the person holding the aforementioned banner, saying "Darkies out! England for English!" is a step too far, a thought so beyond the pale of the condtioning it cannot let itself be "thunk". Which means despite seemingly fighting the doom of the Englishmen, the banner-holder is in fact merely aiding in arguing for it to continue but at a slower pace.
2) The sentence, "In reality, migration is destroying civilisation" is also an example of trying to get someone to accept someone else's definition of the situation. One could quite reasonably argue that it depends on the migrant in question - which is also true. But: it runs towards point one, where you end up again defending the Untergang of the English. Thereofore, if using that line, one needs to have a follow-up prepared that further forces the opponent to use your definitions.
3) Which means anyone going into this needs thinking things through first, and do so in such a way they are honestly trying to defeat in any way their own arguments. An exercise no longer taught in schools here, by the way, and I don't doubt it is and has been the same in Britain for years or decades.
It is far better to state "They must all go!" as the starting point, and then aggressively ask: "You mean some foreigner has the same rights as us to this land? How'd you reckon that then, eh? Do I have a right to your flat, your stuff? No? Why not, you make more than me!" (adding a "you doss cunt you" or similar should be saved as a last resort).
Never forget the goal is not to defeat the one you are talking to if in public; it is to use that person as a canvas for you to paint with your words the message and story you want the audience to warm to.
Yes, all good points. Especially the unexamined framing. A key goal of propaganda of course. Get them to accept some else’s framing of the issue.
That said, people are beginning to question some of what they are told. Their world is becoming unrecognisable and I would argue the grand goals of elites are failing to bring about any of their intended ends.
Time will tell whether people will actually act on this.
I try to write on such themes from a more personal, individual perspective to avoid the trap of entering narratives, as you say.
I still could not make my mind up to write on this Belfast case. Things are getting so surreal with this forceful push to box everything into narratives that you are right, a certain type of storytelling is most likely dead.
To have something that parallels this “hyper reality” and using it as an initial point is becoming almost impossible. Maybe we will have to resort to fiction to be able to do that, and even so we will possibly have to create contemporary fiction to do that.
I think fiction is a powerful method of doing so. I am doing this too, lol. Hoping to publish a novel in the near future which I used to process ideas. I am also working on a few short stories too.
I’m also trying to, but my problem is that my creativity flows when I write about things that I like, especially in fiction. I started some 3 different novels but got stuck into developing them into a narrative path that I enjoy. Which shows me how bad things really are.
I have honed my development process over the years. I now write a treatment and find that helps prevent getting stuck.
I try not to write directly about issues. I prefer to just write a story I like and trust that most of what I read and think about will work its way in.
I try to have at least one optimistic thread within the narrative, and this is what is worrying me. I always had the wildest ideas in how things can turn out better (which also helps me coping with life itself) but for the past 7 years i simply cannot see that anymore - unless I start the whole thing from the perspective of a post-apocalyptic world.
"The world created by the storytellers has run its course. Belfast is just chapter one in what comes next for Britain and ultimately the rest of the West."
Wow, Spiff, you finally got to one of the most pertinent subjects for the Western world. Thanks.
Northern Europeans are the least likely to think tribally. The Northern Irish have retained a more tribal outlook partly because of the extended nature of the troubles there over the years; Irish Republicans versus British Loyalists. They have retained a cohesion other comparable groups have lost.
But reality is coming for everyone as the Paul Craig Roberts article alludes to. A few incidents have happened in Britain that have forced people to reconsider, much as the Karmelo Anthony situation has done in the US. Nothing drastic despite what critics say. Just people reassessing their situation.
As for the boy thrown into the crocodile pen. The alleged thrower has been let go. He apparently has learning difficulties.
" A few incidents have happened in Britain that have forced people to reconsider, much as the Karmelo Anthony situation has done in the US."
More than a few.
"The alleged thrower has been let go. He apparently has learning difficulties."
Why alleged thrower? The people who saw him do it know who he is! 'Learning difficulties'??? The guy is a crazy bastard and a danger to the public, and they let him go. This is the kind of bullshit that people are finally getting tired of. You did not enlighten us on whether the toddler was white and the thrower was not.
I'm not backtracking with anything. The police haven't released any details of the incident as far as I know. At least not specific details of the people involved.
I am aware of what is happening in Britain. The crocodile incident is just one of many.
It is common knowledge here in the US that the liberal elites who have shoved mass immigration down our throats are simply following the plan to over populate and replace with secure lifetime voters. They, the elites, never have to deal with the consequences, of course. They move about in their protected bubbles, armed guards and walls around their estates. I am actually surprised that there hasn't been an uptick in covert vigilante activity. We have been conditioned to be at war with ourselves which is the craftiest way to decimate an entire civilization. The irony is - the elites in their ivory towers have no idea how the real world works.
I agree. Their strategy seems low cost. But it has cost them their connection to reality.
We saw that during Covid when the Canadian truckers brought Canada to a standstill. Many were shocked. They gave no thought to who delivered their food and medicines. They were just working class people.
Much more of this to come. I feel the same way about the AI apocalypse. Manual work will be unaffected. But the office dweller has much to fear.
There is an opening there for sure.
Yes, which is why my youngest four grand kids - one girl, three boys, all rejected going to college. They are learning manual skills that keep the world running. Construction, HVAC electric, and real estate. As I have said before - without the ones who know how to keep the grid up AI has no life.
Absolutely.
Some of the interviews with the low level bureaucrats in Ottawa were hilarious in a grim way. The truckers painfully explaining that they delivered their food. The bureaucrats insisting the truck drivers had no leverage because food came from the back of the grocery store, not trucks. 🤦🏻♀️
Ha! Brilliant. Water comes from the tap. There's loads of it. Lol.
The goal is to create chaos, discomfort and crisis, that (as the narrative goes) only the elite, educated and worldly can "fix". This is their plan to bring about a one world government.
I agree. But that is literal playing with fire. Or perhaps pulling the pin out of a hand grenade to throw it into a crowd. If you trip, you die.
They are not as able as they think.
Looking at this from a spiritual level, I see this as low IQ demons not having a clue what they are doing.
Unfortunately they are not low IQ, and they know what they are doing, their narcissism is so strong, they can’t see their plan will ultimately fail.
I think it is narcissism too. Their inner delusions are now projected outward. They tend towards the grandiose anyway. Net Zero is one such absurdity. It makes no sense even if it were possible.
But I agree they imagine they can ride the tiger they unleash.
Real Utopianism has never been tried.
Nailed it.
Excellent post. John Carter has a longish piece on the Belfast situation which you might find of interest if you haven't seen it:
https://barsoom.substack.com/p/why-dont-british-men-do-something
It struck me as you were describing the narrative-management problem that a key piece of manipulative newspeak is to always refer to an atrocity in say Southport, London, Nottingham or Belfast as a "tragedy". As if it were just something very, very unfortunate. Nobody's fault. Brilliantly chosen word to divert and deflect any noticing of obvious culpability, as you have often spoken of. The problem of people noticing the obvious cause-and-effect in play for the last decade at least.
Yes it is a clever manipulation. Your word, atrocity, is the counter. That is how we must frame these things.
Every day, my appreciation of the late Pat Buchanan grows.
He saw very clearly. It is a special kind of frustration to be ahead of your time I would imagine.
Great article and if the Liberal global criminals who govern us in the UK don't listen and keep calling us far right they can expect the country descending to a worse state than Bosnia at the height of their civil war. Sebrenica here we come.
I think the bubble people are lost. They honestly think critics of immigration are Nazis. They have lost touch with reality.
There is a liberal solution to this problem: reciprocity.
Why should the UK or US take immigrants from countries that do not reciprocate? If Christianity is illegal in your country, you should not be allowed to immigrate to the West. If women are treated as chattel in your country, you should not be allowed to immigrate to the West. If your country refuses to take in its deportees, you should not be allowed to immigrate to the West.
Immigrants from MENA should be limited to genuine asylum cases which are basically the ethnic minorities being driven out by the Muslim majority (Coptic Christians, Druze, Yazidi).
I agree. None of this works. But it is not meant to. We are importing decades or centuries of strife. That is the purpose of it. To keep the show on the road.
Exceptional. Thank you. Godspeed
Thank you. Glad you liked.
“Misplaced compassion” = Suicidal Empathy: Dying to be Kind, by Gad Saad.
Our Uniparty politicians (UK and EU) were warned a year ago via the new USA National Security Strategy that they leading our countries towards “civilizational erasure”: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/2025-National-Security-Strategy.pdf.
President Trump repeated the NSS warnings last week at a G7 press conference, from 41:20
“Hopefully Europe is going to find its way. Europe is having some very bad times, they are doing things very badly on energy and immigration”: https://www.whitehouse.gov/videos/president-trump-holds-a-press-conference-jun-17-2026/.
Needless to say, there is still no sign from our leaders/oppressors of any change in direction.
Yes. The response of the chattering classes was to dismiss the US Government’s warnings as it is a Trump administration. But it is troubling what they observe.
I sincerely believe our leadership class are now unable to manage reality.
It is really homicidal empathy. They expect everyone else to pay - except them.
Stop Press News: Writing on his Truth Social platform, President Trump had just said: “Keir Starmer will resign as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. He failed badly on two very important subjects – IMMIGRATION AND ENERGY (OPEN NORTH SEA OIL!). I wish him well! President DJT.”
A very useful comment also aimed at Starmer’s successor and all UK Uniparty leaders.
His successor will be no better.
"Our Uniparty politicians (UK and EU) were warned a year ago via the new USA National Security Strategy that they leading our countries towards “civilizational erasure”:"
The United States has no moral standing to tell others how to conduct their national affairs. They are one of the most screwed-up countries on the planet, second only to Israel.
I think the US has many problems, as has Trump. But he has repeatedly warned the UK in public about their ruinous policies. Trump has not succumbed to Green energy madness and he has tried to reverse illegal immigration and even tackled DEI. The British establishment have embraced all of the above.
Many here welcomed comments by Trump and Vance. I would also add both men seemed sincere too in their concerns about the direction the British government was taking.
"I would also add both men seemed sincere too in their concerns about the direction the British government was taking."
They should be more concerned about how they are screwing up their own country.
Perhaps. But they were astute observations nonetheless.
"But they were astute observations nonetheless."
It is sad that an idiot like Trump can make an observation that the British people should have made years ago!
Many British people do. But the leadership people, the politicians and others, have different ideas.
I think you are having a problem understanding reality, despite how you refer to yourself. Or else, you’ve not ventured forth from your entitled, elite enclave in a very long time, if ever.
"Or else, you’ve not ventured forth from your entitled, elite enclave in a very long time, if ever."
Right back at yeah!
You are drinking the Kool-Aid.
Another thing - what media et al does by telling stories is, they get you to accept their definition of the situation.
Look at the picture of the people holding the banner saying "Illegal migration is destroying our civilisation", it's a perfect example of someone's conditoning kicking in and effecting crimestop. In reality, migration is what is destroying civilisation.
Some points, if you pardon me going into lecturing-hectoring mode:
1) If the legal status of the migrant(s) is the issue, all it takes is a few strokes of a pen at no. 10 and suddenly the problem is gone, since the formerly illegal migrants are now legal. But for the person holding the aforementioned banner, saying "Darkies out! England for English!" is a step too far, a thought so beyond the pale of the condtioning it cannot let itself be "thunk". Which means despite seemingly fighting the doom of the Englishmen, the banner-holder is in fact merely aiding in arguing for it to continue but at a slower pace.
2) The sentence, "In reality, migration is destroying civilisation" is also an example of trying to get someone to accept someone else's definition of the situation. One could quite reasonably argue that it depends on the migrant in question - which is also true. But: it runs towards point one, where you end up again defending the Untergang of the English. Thereofore, if using that line, one needs to have a follow-up prepared that further forces the opponent to use your definitions.
3) Which means anyone going into this needs thinking things through first, and do so in such a way they are honestly trying to defeat in any way their own arguments. An exercise no longer taught in schools here, by the way, and I don't doubt it is and has been the same in Britain for years or decades.
It is far better to state "They must all go!" as the starting point, and then aggressively ask: "You mean some foreigner has the same rights as us to this land? How'd you reckon that then, eh? Do I have a right to your flat, your stuff? No? Why not, you make more than me!" (adding a "you doss cunt you" or similar should be saved as a last resort).
Never forget the goal is not to defeat the one you are talking to if in public; it is to use that person as a canvas for you to paint with your words the message and story you want the audience to warm to.
Yes, all good points. Especially the unexamined framing. A key goal of propaganda of course. Get them to accept some else’s framing of the issue.
That said, people are beginning to question some of what they are told. Their world is becoming unrecognisable and I would argue the grand goals of elites are failing to bring about any of their intended ends.
Time will tell whether people will actually act on this.
I try to write on such themes from a more personal, individual perspective to avoid the trap of entering narratives, as you say.
I still could not make my mind up to write on this Belfast case. Things are getting so surreal with this forceful push to box everything into narratives that you are right, a certain type of storytelling is most likely dead.
To have something that parallels this “hyper reality” and using it as an initial point is becoming almost impossible. Maybe we will have to resort to fiction to be able to do that, and even so we will possibly have to create contemporary fiction to do that.
I think fiction is a powerful method of doing so. I am doing this too, lol. Hoping to publish a novel in the near future which I used to process ideas. I am also working on a few short stories too.
I’m also trying to, but my problem is that my creativity flows when I write about things that I like, especially in fiction. I started some 3 different novels but got stuck into developing them into a narrative path that I enjoy. Which shows me how bad things really are.
I have honed my development process over the years. I now write a treatment and find that helps prevent getting stuck.
I try not to write directly about issues. I prefer to just write a story I like and trust that most of what I read and think about will work its way in.
I try to have at least one optimistic thread within the narrative, and this is what is worrying me. I always had the wildest ideas in how things can turn out better (which also helps me coping with life itself) but for the past 7 years i simply cannot see that anymore - unless I start the whole thing from the perspective of a post-apocalyptic world.
"The world created by the storytellers has run its course. Belfast is just chapter one in what comes next for Britain and ultimately the rest of the West."
Wow, Spiff, you finally got to one of the most pertinent subjects for the Western world. Thanks.
Here are some more opinions on this.
https://www.amren.com/videos/2026/06/what-does-it-take-to-wake-up-white-people/
https://paulcraigroberts.org/every-white-ethnicity-faces-demise/
The toddler in this next article is most likely white, while the thrower is most likely not. Enlighten us.
https://www.rt.com/news/641908-uk-toddler-crocodile-suspect-released/
Northern Europeans are the least likely to think tribally. The Northern Irish have retained a more tribal outlook partly because of the extended nature of the troubles there over the years; Irish Republicans versus British Loyalists. They have retained a cohesion other comparable groups have lost.
But reality is coming for everyone as the Paul Craig Roberts article alludes to. A few incidents have happened in Britain that have forced people to reconsider, much as the Karmelo Anthony situation has done in the US. Nothing drastic despite what critics say. Just people reassessing their situation.
As for the boy thrown into the crocodile pen. The alleged thrower has been let go. He apparently has learning difficulties.
" A few incidents have happened in Britain that have forced people to reconsider, much as the Karmelo Anthony situation has done in the US."
More than a few.
"The alleged thrower has been let go. He apparently has learning difficulties."
Why alleged thrower? The people who saw him do it know who he is! 'Learning difficulties'??? The guy is a crazy bastard and a danger to the public, and they let him go. This is the kind of bullshit that people are finally getting tired of. You did not enlighten us on whether the toddler was white and the thrower was not.
I don't know the answer to those questions. The police have not released many details. All I know is the child has some serious injuries.
"The police have not released many details."
I wonder why that would be.
Your article seemed to show some understanding of the deep crap the UK was in, as well as the rest of the West. Now you seem to be backtracking.
I'm not backtracking with anything. The police haven't released any details of the incident as far as I know. At least not specific details of the people involved.
I am aware of what is happening in Britain. The crocodile incident is just one of many.