Yours is a fair and balanced assessment of this incident. I've read and listened to quite a few opinions, John Carter's being one of the best. You both extract the motivations, correctly I believe, of the contributors to Shiloh Hendrix's GoFundMe.
The noisy activists and hypocrites, those in their protected shelters of wealth and separation who are misanthropic toward humans unlike themselves, looking down their haughty noses and judging, while hiding behind their virtue signaling are the sowers of dissension and hate. They are the true racists.
I enjoyed reading your take on this subject. Thank you.
Yes I believe so too. The middle classes who endorse mass immigration are not bearing the brunt of its effect. They hide behind pieties but deep down believe the immigrants to be a weapon to use against the hated working classes. What is that if not genuine racism?
Alas they tend to occupy key positions in society, hence the widespread evidence of their existence. But they are few in number. Under ten percent of the population in my estimation.
Their enemy is reality, and it is coming for them. Their luxury beliefs will have serious consequences for us all.
Completely agree. An absolutely disgraceful state of affairs. The people we rely on most. They manage the infrastructure, the sewage systems, collecting the garbage, delivering the food and medicines.
I think it is a side effect of educating women. Female college graduates despise working class men; they look down on them because they are not husband material. Men tend to be more even handed. Plus men don't require their girlfriends to be anything except attractive.
I think this feminine malice has crept in to everything frankly.
You're focusing on Muh Racism--that ginned-up bolshevik ghost from the past--and missing a crucial point:
The remaking of the US economy since the 1970s. From a basis in productive endeavors producing real world outcomes, to financialization (numbers and casino games) implemented by a Permastate, where those who mouth their handlers'/controllers' shibboleths get to secure and retain a sinecure in the system, and the paycheck and perks that go with it.
It isn't surprising that people would adapt to this situation in this way...given that from the '70s on it has increasingly become the only game in town (and the Ed Biz and Permastate the employers of last resort)...but let's not misdiagnose it.
When my passels of Ed Biz and Permastate neighbors react to whatever current events or real life issues by eructating formulas handed to them by Jeff Bezos (WaPo), Laurene Powell Jobs (The Atlantic), Meredith Kopin Levine (NYT), etc., and fortified by content produced by globalist NGOs and advertisers-----they are doing what it takes to keep their privileges. AND to advertise their caste status.
This also serves as a warning to anyone who might question all that, and additionally serves as a signalling mechanism (does the other person respond in the appropriate way? If so, they get provisional inclusion; if not, they are the enemy.)
This isn't large power in the globalist scheme of things...but it is very real power. If you doubt that, look at how quickly these Permastate types rushed to turn their neighbors in to the state for violating a gubernatorial proclamation during Muh Covid.
But there is a mindhack baked in to this: they must pretend to be AGAINST privilege, while aspiring to/securing/extending it, while knowing it can be yanked away at any moment, with themselves and their families shite out of luck. (Better Shiloh Hendrix be sacrificed on the altar. "Do it to Julia! Not to me!")
The psychological tension produced by this has to go somewhere...and where better but to direct it at those who question the whole damn system. Many of whom never bought in, in the first place, or couldn't buy in if they wanted to. (The Ed Biz as a credentialling mechanism of PC/DEI clicks in, here.) Or who are just plain weary of it.
The choice of white people as the punching bag in the 1970s was very deliberate and carefully engineered. Review the CBS TV network's "rural purge" in that decade, where massively popular genres of television programming, revolving around pioneer, rural, small town, and suburban white life, were replaced with comedies and dramas of major metropolis neurosis and culture, and increasing levels of celebration of degeneracy and eventually hostility.
I doubt you would stand for me naming the ethnic cohort behind that, even though those of us who were in the middle of it in the '80s and on could still openly observe and name the dynamics. But that was rendered verboten to speak as well, starting in the mid '90s and increasingly punished and extended. This all went hand-in-glove with the globalists' open borders policies, and the managed decline that has served today's global billionaires' caste so well.
Today it is easier to blame "progressives" and engage in (also engineered) bipolar slapfests than to accurately and courageously name the features of what is really happening.
Nobody is missing anything, so get off your high horse. The spat we are discussing was about a racial slur i.e. the basis of this is perceived as racism. It is worthy of discussion, especially the aspect I focused on, the emergence of some notion of solidarity among whites. Or not, as the case may be.
I have noticed those interested in the JQ view it as the only show in town, colouring everything else. We can surely discuss the local effects of today's zeitgeist regardless of who ultimately operates the levers of power? Or was this a nefarious Jewish plot to hassle single mothers?
I have noticed some are so focused on the forest of conspiracies they miss the lopping down of local trees we ought to be paying more attention to because we can actually do something about them.
And once again, the focus is on the unfairness of targeting a young mother with total ruin as acceptable social punishment. Some clearly disagree and have acted to show their disfavour of this practice. I would argue that is more practical than agonizing over what the Jews are up to because it has an immediate, real-world effect even if on a limited scale.
Dude, I was trained at the master's and PhD level to work in Challahwood and Madison Avenue at the most jewish of the Ivies.
Billionaire jews were my clients in my business.
I had jewish relatives by marriage.
Are you assuming I'm not a jew awake to what jews do? Or is it just that you would rather that be silenced--that there's only one way to think or speak or opine about that, and you determine it?
This isn't a "high horse," it's lived experience. If you don't want to hear about that, be honest that you want to live up in your head. If lived experience isn't welcome in comments, signal that.
But I'd question your eagerness to shut down this set of perspectives...or assume it is "agonizing over what the jews are up to."
Are you some kind of racist who thinks all jews think alike, or have the same experiences?
Are you denying that jews have had massive impact on American mass and institutional culture that has nothing to do with anti-white racism?
You do you, and it's your blog. But you're accusing ME of what YOU are doing. Kek.
You want to fantasize about how the world works, have at it. You want to exclude lived experience, more power to you. But don't project your stereotypes on others while claiming to be above all that.
The golliwogs think that they have won, aided as they are by the traitors and idealists holding the borders open while protecting rape-gangs, slave-traders and other scum of the Earth as long as said scum is non-White and preferably moslem.
They should think again. They have never, ever, been able to stand up to Europeans, unless other Europeans acted as traitors and turncoats.
Time to remind them that the peoples of this continent, and our colonial offspring around the world, are the premier builders of civilisation, society, culture, technology.
I think the tacit support for Hendrix was an opening salvo in this conflict. It is a very European thing to be polite but firm. And if that does not work, well...
Different from the USA, in Europe the uniting factor for non-Whites is precisely that; that they are not-name of a people.
Not-English, Not-Swedish, Not-German and so on, is their uniting factor.
Quite handy for anyone opposing them: no need to distinguish between a kurd and a turk. They're both foreign and can be lumped and dumped together.
In 2014, I suggested the correct way of handling illegals would be using old super-cargo ships, pack the illegals onto them and run the ships ashore in Tunisia and Turkey.
Ethnicity does play a role, but not in the sense that we are led to believe. I mean, it's not like it's a set of immutable characteristics depending on where you were born. It's always up to the individual to claim things like: "I'm [insert colour, ethnicity, nationality, gender, whatever], so as such I'm [oppressed, a victim, entitled to this and that...]", the real agenda being to make your life harder and theirs easier. And it's very true that they count on an inordinate amount of patience from everyone else, which is a risky gamble.
May I suggest that you don't even think of pulling that on me. I'm unusually generous and patient with people in genuine hardship - whoever they are - but I have exactly zero patience for this kind of ploy. You see, I don't even like people - as in, not *at all* - all I have for them is patience, and you really don't want to know what happens when it runs out.
Ethnicity has been weaponized. Similar to climate and all it promises; recycling, farming, plastics. Once a thing becomes a thing it can be exploited.
Same with race or ethnic origin. Society's controllers want it to be prominent, despite rhetoric about it only being skin deep etc.
Most are tired of it, including some minorities. Alas whole bureaucracies exist to service race grievance. It will take time to dismantle. It really is a machine at this stage.
No doubt many people do it. But people pushing things like affirmative action tend to be on the Left, not the conservative end of the spectrum.
Traditional conservatism tends to advocate resilience and independence, not government programs to perpetuate dependence. That dependence often creates resentment which is routinely ignored by advocates of such things. Hence the point I made.
She isn't on video calling the kid who stole from her nigger. She was accused of that by the Somali pedophile who happened to be lurking in a children's playground looking for his next victim. The pedo used the word nigger first in the video and she responded.
I think he asked her, did you call the child that word and she said yes.
Although the point is it doesn't matter if attitudes are shifting. People are aware a machine was activated that would have ruined her without a second thought in contrast to how others are treated for far worse behaviour.
I do think growing numbers have simply had enough.
I am not sure why the guy was in the playground. I just assumed his own kid was there. Worrying if not.
However, the focus shifted when it was revealed that the individual who recorded this video, a Somali, has a troubling background as a registered sex offender. The average IQ in Somalia is 69. It's reasonable to assume the pedo is mentally disabled.
Shiloh Hendrix is the George Floyd of White folks.
And that's a good thing.
If it were not for the outrage of the murderer Karmelo Anthony's fundraiser, I wonder if as much money would have been raised.
It's clear that pro-White folks wanted to send a message by raising so much more money than Anthony.
I'm sure even more money would be raised except 'conservative' (jewish) media have done everything to suppress a positive response to Shiloh's actions.
It's clear pro-Whites are willing to struggle not only with the anti-White non-White community but also with the anti-White *White* liberal community.
I suspect Hendrix will be the marker for the emergence of this. Or perhaps many Hendrix-style moments. Importantly, given media hostility and their general unwillingness to publicize these kind of things, we can assume a genuine, organic change is happening. That is in sharp contrast to many astroturfed movements with their hired outrage.
The ‘resistance’ is there but inchoate. This ‘leaderless resistance’ approach has served WN very well in the years between the Oklahoma bombing and now. Since, for all practical purposes, every Concerned White is 'behind enemy lines’, White resistance may need to function along the lines of a leaderless resistance guerilla operation more than a ‘movement’.
‘Movements’ get infiltrated.
What Baudrillard called ‘The Shadow of the Silent Majorities’ cannot be.
I suspect it is culture change we may see. A kind of exhaustion. When the DEI stuff is really dropped and we see indifference to how merit actually plays out. Relegating these false gods like equality to the dustbin of history would be a start.
Surely more and more grow bored with constant hassle about racism? We are all tired of it.
Lol. That is not my take on things. I also don't believe whites are itching for a fight. We have been domesticated. Although perhaps that is changing.
I think the next phase, so to speak, will be the emergence of realism making many claims against white America nonsensical. The decolonization and all the rest.
I think while Boomers are still around very little will happen.
I think I was not clear. When I say ‘fight’ I mean struggle, both overt and covert. The effort to give more money to Shiloh Hendrix than our enemies did to Karmelo Anthony is indicative, I think, of the ‘fight’ that is in White people.
I don’t think the Boomers are the obstacle you think they are. Most of them are indulgent and more than willing to retreat if confronted with any real opposition.
It’s smug self-satisfaction that results from impunity from the consequence of race-mixing that is our biggest obstacle.
And that kind of thing isn’t really age-bound.
Whites are starting to care about Whites because they are White and the pseudo-politics that have thrived as a parasite on the White Body Politics is either going to change or be plowed under.
I’m sure you saw how ‘conservatives’ and supposedly ‘pro-White’ accounts tried to make the Shiloh Incident into something other than ‘Negro’ vs ‘White’…and failing.
No one who gave money to Shiloh cared if Shiloh was ‘virtuous’ according to ‘conservative values’.
They - rightly - saw arrogant privileged niggers threatening a White woman and child who stood up for herself and her child.
What I saw was 70 years of ‘conservative’ anti-White liberal kumbaya racial politics annihilated in a matter of days.
On X, now without censorship thanks to Elon Musk, out of control violence has become standard fodder for ridicule with blacks typically being the most violent group depicted. Unfortunately, the stereotype of black violence is rooted in reality. Despite being ignored by mainstream media for years, where white people decide to live, shop, vacation and even if they are willing to use public transit has been for decades largely based on avoiding large groups of black people because of their perceived and actual tendency to engage in violence.
Another example of forbidding open discussion just makes life more complex. But real life carries on regardless. People do have to live in the real world where real world things happen. But then again a sizable portion of society seem to get their worldview exclusively from TV.
It is just a word. I must admit I once feared the saying of it, what's funny to me is that it was black-Canadian, some African and black-American friends who castigated me for years for refusing to say it. I could not as it seemed like I'd be crossing a line (I was a normie and academic at the time).
Yet now I can only think that these are our nations; we ought to be allowed to say what we want, when we want and how we want to.
No one should make us feel as I did; ashamed to say a word. Ours are the most glorious societies on earth, with only Asia rivalling us. Europe built the greatest civilizations, the finest literature and 98% of all inventions. The whole of 'Christendom', the whole of North America, the British Commonwealth, and Europe are ours by right. We're taking them back.
Let us hope this is a turning of the tide. We must take back our rights, our words, our literature and our prior glory.
Eh bien, l'anglosphère est plus grande, mais peut-être que rien ne peut égaler la France en termes de talent artistique ; nous aimerions tous être français dans ce sens.
I agree, either everybody should be allowed to say it or nobody should, it's either a word fit for polite company or not. It can't be both depending upon who is saying it!
There were definite racial problems in the past, but everyone worked so hard to improve them, and by the early 1970's it seemed the whole country was together on this.
There were many all black shows on TV, and they were very popular. It was cool for kids of all races to hang out together. Comedians were making jokes about ethnicity in a good natured way, which of course is forbidden today.
By 2008 we were sure that everything was good, and had no problem electing a black president. Then things changed.
The new president seemed to inject himself into every controversy with an opinion suggesting it was driven by racism. A black professor was arrested when police responded to a call about a break in. Professor Gates had been away in China, and on returning found his door jammed, and had his driver help him force open the door. He accused the police of racism when they arrived, and was arrested for being disorderly after repeated warnings.
The president of the US injected himself worldwide saying "The police acted stupidly". There were many more examples after that, especially with his "Wing man", the attorney general of the US, also a black man, who began his time as the nations top law enforcement by telling us that we had always been cowards about race.
Unfortunately, we have seen the forces of chaos in action since then. Cancel culture, race baiting, PC censorship, sexual degeneracy, absolute trash being taught in schools, and we have a new generation growing up believing this crap.
I'm glad to see people have had enough. This is the kind of abuse that, if not dealt with, can lead to worse abuse or even death.
Laugh at them, ignore them, or tell them off. We've had enough of this nonsense.
I agree. And I believe this is what we witnessed with Hendrix. Whites have bent over backwards and no one else bothers so why are we? That is the next question that will emerge. Why are we doing this?
We have to get control of our culture back. With this new millennium, we have seen the internet and reality TV destroy polite society.
It's a good sign that the first generation to grow up with this, and now being parents, are making moves for smart phones to be removed from schools. We have to balance technology use so that it does not make us degenerate and dumb.
That is a serious worry of mine. The way people become addicted to technology. I see grown adults walking along the street with their phones like zombies. But what would that do to children who grow up using them? Will they ever read a book?
Our enemy is convenience I believe. Technology makes life convenient, so why strive?
Indeed; a little tongue in cheek. No need to stoop to their level after all. I think most of us appreciate the gall of a foreigner behaving as he did with the express intent of ruining a young woman's life. Although the fund contributors had the last laugh.
"I think most of us appreciate the gall of a foreigner behaving as he did with the express intent of ruining a young woman's life."
Of course, one is free to speak for others on their own page. But I'd be willing to bet that most people, in fact, do not appreaciate "the gall of a foreigner behaving wtih the intent of ruining a young woman's life."
Also, it's possible that the one having the last laugh is the platform that received the contributions. Put bluntly, what if this whole thing was an orchestrated scam to get some quick cash from a gullible public desperate for some kind of "victory"?
Seriously, would it surprise anyone? After all, the hostile elite, and their paid proxies and useful idiots, are all well-practiced scammers. It's what they're all about. Whatever it is - and who can tell? - I like to keep a big bag of salt by my side for things like this.
Ironically, the importation of other groups without any historical reason to feel guilt will be the ones who push it over the edge. They are far less afraid to say what white people can’t say.
Go on popular social media where the midwits and short form content consumers hang out and it is all enormous amounts of black people (mostly women) and pathetic white grovelers making noise about this case and planning their next move to pressure the payment processor to shut the fund down (but not the Karmelo Anthony one. That one they still say “fuck the white boy” and “self defense”)
Others, though, aren’t chiming in yet but they see the double standard as well. The illusion of “people of color” as a group doesn’t work when people actually live together and see what they’re asked to tolerate for sake of “community”. Just like LGBTQ, this BIPOC is an unstable alliance. It will be “B” on one side and “IPOC” on the other.
It all ends when we say enough. At the moment the media will publicize nothing except the approved narrative. So the bubble survives. But real life is intruding more and more given the effects of mass immigration. The midwits will be hit hardest in my view.
I have seen the people you are referring to. I work alongside them. It is all performance.
I don’t think the masses change anything if the ultra wealthy are still funding NGOs and messaging that keeps the charade going.
It ends the very minute the elites decide to stop propping up all the bullshit. The whole white guilt complex and obfuscation against pattern noticing is all elite stuff astroturfing. It only works in a captured media and censorship model with heavy funding to activist groups. Without their paid smoke screens, the noticing becomes impossible to deny.
I am of the theory that it is possible to have racial harmony. But it won't be done without facing some hard facts and definitely not by privileging a group and excusing them of any responsibility.
The past is the past, slavery was a stain in our history, but it is done, and besides that, most whites didn't benefit for them, but for a tiny minority.
African blacks sold other blacks in their ports to mostly jewish merchants that in turn sold them to a few rich white landowners in all of the American continents. The other whites had to compete against those rich landlords that counted with the advantage of free labor. And those other whites were the majority of the whites, and thus most of us probably didn't descend from slave owners.
For the blacks now, the hard reality is that their ancestors paid with their work and their blood for their citizenships in the richest and most advanced nation on the earth. And they are not fully either recognizing or enjoying this privilege correctly.
Inner city public schools are a mess not because bad whitey escaped to the suburbs and thus deprived those schools of a vigorous tax base. Inner city schools are a mess because a bunch of black kids act like criminals from an early age, making the life of other black kids hell, making the teacher's lives hell, vandalizing and destroying everything on their path, and nobody can say an iota about it.
Black community leaders spend too much time complaining about a past, a past which most whites living now are not even remotely responsible for. Black leaders instead of denouncing gangsta rappers as the disgusting useless pieces of excrement they are, instead, promote them as role models. Yes, because black leaders sons are going to Yale, it is easy for them to promote filthy for the other blacks who are going to pay the price of a decadent, stupid and asinine culture of thuggery, sexual immorality and violence. It is easy for an Obama to promote the memory of a stupid useless criminal as Tupac when his girls were busy having an European education, learning French and German, with Piano and History of Art private tutors.
For the other black "leaders" like Sharpton or the run-of-the-mill academic activist it is easy to promote degeneration in black culture when they live comfortably isolated from the effects as privileged Manhattanites dispatched by their chauffeurs from one 5th Ave modern art vernissage to a beach weekend in a upscale estate in The Hamptons. Even better if any additional black on black homicide, every single fentanyl overdose, any additional teenage black single mom means more grant moneys for their endless "academic" projects, more useless bureaucratic cushy jobs and more donations from clueless woke heiress foundations.
Sometimes we need to be able to utter a crass word, when this is the only way to shout that the king has no clothes.
I do not share your rosey view. America stands as testament to the failure of multiculturalism. The only way it can work is one group absolutely dominates, and others accept their authority. What we now call multiculturalism has never worked anywhere. It always descends into conflict.
The appropriate view is the one almost everyone on Earth shares; everyone needs their own homeland that is exclusively theirs. They should not have to share it with foreigners.
The point was not about the behaviour of the young boy. It doesn't matter as the issue is the ruination of people through doxxing etc.
As for white trash; this is their perception of people like Hendrix. A useful thing for us to remember. Many middle class people despise the lower orders. In the US the term white trash sums up their views well.
I'm old enough to remember white people casually using the word nigger and when being a nigger lover could get one in significant trouble. Things have gotten better, but the Left is trying to milk the past and act like the Civil Rights Era didn't happen. They are using the Charles Manson Strategy and it pisses me off to no end.
There are parts of this country where Martin Luther King's Dream is actually happening -- especially in the rural South. I have twice as much house as I could otherwise afford because I live in such a place. I seriously want to do bad things to those Whites who live in the remaining Whitopias race bait bait for political gain.
A bit under a half century ago I figured that the N word would become a badge of honor, much as many other ethnic minorities have treated their gritty past as badges of honor. (See how Conan O'Brien and Seth MacFarlane treat their Irishness in The Simpsons and Family Guy, respectively.) Wokeness has diverted this natural path towards social equality.
A positive shoutout to Aaron McGruder and the rest of the crew of the Boondocks cartoon. They played fair, showing glimpses of the Bad Old Days along side earnest Whites trying to make amends -- along with overly generous uses of the N word. I wish I was rich enough to finance a reboot.
Yours is a fair and balanced assessment of this incident. I've read and listened to quite a few opinions, John Carter's being one of the best. You both extract the motivations, correctly I believe, of the contributors to Shiloh Hendrix's GoFundMe.
The noisy activists and hypocrites, those in their protected shelters of wealth and separation who are misanthropic toward humans unlike themselves, looking down their haughty noses and judging, while hiding behind their virtue signaling are the sowers of dissension and hate. They are the true racists.
I enjoyed reading your take on this subject. Thank you.
Yes I believe so too. The middle classes who endorse mass immigration are not bearing the brunt of its effect. They hide behind pieties but deep down believe the immigrants to be a weapon to use against the hated working classes. What is that if not genuine racism?
And thank you again for your comments.
Luxury beliefs demonstrate the height of ignorance and are the bain of our existence. A pox on these silly, but dangerous, people.
Alas they tend to occupy key positions in society, hence the widespread evidence of their existence. But they are few in number. Under ten percent of the population in my estimation.
Their enemy is reality, and it is coming for them. Their luxury beliefs will have serious consequences for us all.
100% The working classes of all white nations are the most hated demographic groups.
Completely agree. An absolutely disgraceful state of affairs. The people we rely on most. They manage the infrastructure, the sewage systems, collecting the garbage, delivering the food and medicines.
I think it is a side effect of educating women. Female college graduates despise working class men; they look down on them because they are not husband material. Men tend to be more even handed. Plus men don't require their girlfriends to be anything except attractive.
I think this feminine malice has crept in to everything frankly.
You're focusing on Muh Racism--that ginned-up bolshevik ghost from the past--and missing a crucial point:
The remaking of the US economy since the 1970s. From a basis in productive endeavors producing real world outcomes, to financialization (numbers and casino games) implemented by a Permastate, where those who mouth their handlers'/controllers' shibboleths get to secure and retain a sinecure in the system, and the paycheck and perks that go with it.
It isn't surprising that people would adapt to this situation in this way...given that from the '70s on it has increasingly become the only game in town (and the Ed Biz and Permastate the employers of last resort)...but let's not misdiagnose it.
When my passels of Ed Biz and Permastate neighbors react to whatever current events or real life issues by eructating formulas handed to them by Jeff Bezos (WaPo), Laurene Powell Jobs (The Atlantic), Meredith Kopin Levine (NYT), etc., and fortified by content produced by globalist NGOs and advertisers-----they are doing what it takes to keep their privileges. AND to advertise their caste status.
This also serves as a warning to anyone who might question all that, and additionally serves as a signalling mechanism (does the other person respond in the appropriate way? If so, they get provisional inclusion; if not, they are the enemy.)
This isn't large power in the globalist scheme of things...but it is very real power. If you doubt that, look at how quickly these Permastate types rushed to turn their neighbors in to the state for violating a gubernatorial proclamation during Muh Covid.
https://www.wethegoverned.com/governor-inslees-informant-army-heres-the-snitch-list/
But there is a mindhack baked in to this: they must pretend to be AGAINST privilege, while aspiring to/securing/extending it, while knowing it can be yanked away at any moment, with themselves and their families shite out of luck. (Better Shiloh Hendrix be sacrificed on the altar. "Do it to Julia! Not to me!")
The psychological tension produced by this has to go somewhere...and where better but to direct it at those who question the whole damn system. Many of whom never bought in, in the first place, or couldn't buy in if they wanted to. (The Ed Biz as a credentialling mechanism of PC/DEI clicks in, here.) Or who are just plain weary of it.
The choice of white people as the punching bag in the 1970s was very deliberate and carefully engineered. Review the CBS TV network's "rural purge" in that decade, where massively popular genres of television programming, revolving around pioneer, rural, small town, and suburban white life, were replaced with comedies and dramas of major metropolis neurosis and culture, and increasing levels of celebration of degeneracy and eventually hostility.
I doubt you would stand for me naming the ethnic cohort behind that, even though those of us who were in the middle of it in the '80s and on could still openly observe and name the dynamics. But that was rendered verboten to speak as well, starting in the mid '90s and increasingly punished and extended. This all went hand-in-glove with the globalists' open borders policies, and the managed decline that has served today's global billionaires' caste so well.
Today it is easier to blame "progressives" and engage in (also engineered) bipolar slapfests than to accurately and courageously name the features of what is really happening.
Nobody is missing anything, so get off your high horse. The spat we are discussing was about a racial slur i.e. the basis of this is perceived as racism. It is worthy of discussion, especially the aspect I focused on, the emergence of some notion of solidarity among whites. Or not, as the case may be.
I have noticed those interested in the JQ view it as the only show in town, colouring everything else. We can surely discuss the local effects of today's zeitgeist regardless of who ultimately operates the levers of power? Or was this a nefarious Jewish plot to hassle single mothers?
I have noticed some are so focused on the forest of conspiracies they miss the lopping down of local trees we ought to be paying more attention to because we can actually do something about them.
And once again, the focus is on the unfairness of targeting a young mother with total ruin as acceptable social punishment. Some clearly disagree and have acted to show their disfavour of this practice. I would argue that is more practical than agonizing over what the Jews are up to because it has an immediate, real-world effect even if on a limited scale.
I uh didn't say anything about jews.
You did.
Dude, I was trained at the master's and PhD level to work in Challahwood and Madison Avenue at the most jewish of the Ivies.
Billionaire jews were my clients in my business.
I had jewish relatives by marriage.
Are you assuming I'm not a jew awake to what jews do? Or is it just that you would rather that be silenced--that there's only one way to think or speak or opine about that, and you determine it?
This isn't a "high horse," it's lived experience. If you don't want to hear about that, be honest that you want to live up in your head. If lived experience isn't welcome in comments, signal that.
But I'd question your eagerness to shut down this set of perspectives...or assume it is "agonizing over what the jews are up to."
Are you some kind of racist who thinks all jews think alike, or have the same experiences?
Are you denying that jews have had massive impact on American mass and institutional culture that has nothing to do with anti-white racism?
You do you, and it's your blog. But you're accusing ME of what YOU are doing. Kek.
You want to fantasize about how the world works, have at it. You want to exclude lived experience, more power to you. But don't project your stereotypes on others while claiming to be above all that.
You challenged me about the ethnicity of who was behind this. I assume you meant the Jews and JQ.
Was I wrong? If so, who were you referring to?
A couple more Shiloh Hendrixes and the whole charade is over. I'll take her over George Floyd every fucking day and twice on Sundays.
I suspect there will be many more incidents like these.
The golliwogs think that they have won, aided as they are by the traitors and idealists holding the borders open while protecting rape-gangs, slave-traders and other scum of the Earth as long as said scum is non-White and preferably moslem.
They should think again. They have never, ever, been able to stand up to Europeans, unless other Europeans acted as traitors and turncoats.
Time to remind them that the peoples of this continent, and our colonial offspring around the world, are the premier builders of civilisation, society, culture, technology.
And war.
Time to remind them.
I think the tacit support for Hendrix was an opening salvo in this conflict. It is a very European thing to be polite but firm. And if that does not work, well...
Yep.
Different from the USA, in Europe the uniting factor for non-Whites is precisely that; that they are not-name of a people.
Not-English, Not-Swedish, Not-German and so on, is their uniting factor.
Quite handy for anyone opposing them: no need to distinguish between a kurd and a turk. They're both foreign and can be lumped and dumped together.
In 2014, I suggested the correct way of handling illegals would be using old super-cargo ships, pack the illegals onto them and run the ships ashore in Tunisia and Turkey.
"Return to sender, adress unknown"
That suggestion would probably get you jailed today, lol.
It's not so much about race anymore, it's more about a culture of ungratefulness and no accountability, and lots of white people are very good at it.
I do think ethnicity plays its part. But ingratitude too as you suggest.
People bite the hand that feeds them, something the progressives refuse to acknowledge. No good deed goes unpunished.
Ethnicity does play a role, but not in the sense that we are led to believe. I mean, it's not like it's a set of immutable characteristics depending on where you were born. It's always up to the individual to claim things like: "I'm [insert colour, ethnicity, nationality, gender, whatever], so as such I'm [oppressed, a victim, entitled to this and that...]", the real agenda being to make your life harder and theirs easier. And it's very true that they count on an inordinate amount of patience from everyone else, which is a risky gamble.
May I suggest that you don't even think of pulling that on me. I'm unusually generous and patient with people in genuine hardship - whoever they are - but I have exactly zero patience for this kind of ploy. You see, I don't even like people - as in, not *at all* - all I have for them is patience, and you really don't want to know what happens when it runs out.
Ethnicity has been weaponized. Similar to climate and all it promises; recycling, farming, plastics. Once a thing becomes a thing it can be exploited.
Same with race or ethnic origin. Society's controllers want it to be prominent, despite rhetoric about it only being skin deep etc.
Most are tired of it, including some minorities. Alas whole bureaucracies exist to service race grievance. It will take time to dismantle. It really is a machine at this stage.
> something the progressives refuse to acknowledge.
Are you claiming "conservatives" don't also do it?
No doubt many people do it. But people pushing things like affirmative action tend to be on the Left, not the conservative end of the spectrum.
Traditional conservatism tends to advocate resilience and independence, not government programs to perpetuate dependence. That dependence often creates resentment which is routinely ignored by advocates of such things. Hence the point I made.
She isn't on video calling the kid who stole from her nigger. She was accused of that by the Somali pedophile who happened to be lurking in a children's playground looking for his next victim. The pedo used the word nigger first in the video and she responded.
I think he asked her, did you call the child that word and she said yes.
Although the point is it doesn't matter if attitudes are shifting. People are aware a machine was activated that would have ruined her without a second thought in contrast to how others are treated for far worse behaviour.
I do think growing numbers have simply had enough.
I am not sure why the guy was in the playground. I just assumed his own kid was there. Worrying if not.
However, the focus shifted when it was revealed that the individual who recorded this video, a Somali, has a troubling background as a registered sex offender. The average IQ in Somalia is 69. It's reasonable to assume the pedo is mentally disabled.
https://countylocalnews.com/2025/05/02/shocking-twist-somali-man-behind-viral-video-is-a-sex-offender/
Could be. Although he didn't sound like someone with such a low IQ. I doubt his troubled background was explored in the traditional media.
He kidnapped and raped a young girl, so there's that.
Very troubling indeed if true.
Shiloh Hendrix is the George Floyd of White folks.
And that's a good thing.
If it were not for the outrage of the murderer Karmelo Anthony's fundraiser, I wonder if as much money would have been raised.
It's clear that pro-White folks wanted to send a message by raising so much more money than Anthony.
I'm sure even more money would be raised except 'conservative' (jewish) media have done everything to suppress a positive response to Shiloh's actions.
It's clear pro-Whites are willing to struggle not only with the anti-White non-White community but also with the anti-White *White* liberal community.
White racial consciousness is a beautiful thing.
I suspect Hendrix will be the marker for the emergence of this. Or perhaps many Hendrix-style moments. Importantly, given media hostility and their general unwillingness to publicize these kind of things, we can assume a genuine, organic change is happening. That is in sharp contrast to many astroturfed movements with their hired outrage.
I think things are changing.
The ‘resistance’ is there but inchoate. This ‘leaderless resistance’ approach has served WN very well in the years between the Oklahoma bombing and now. Since, for all practical purposes, every Concerned White is 'behind enemy lines’, White resistance may need to function along the lines of a leaderless resistance guerilla operation more than a ‘movement’.
‘Movements’ get infiltrated.
What Baudrillard called ‘The Shadow of the Silent Majorities’ cannot be.
I suspect it is culture change we may see. A kind of exhaustion. When the DEI stuff is really dropped and we see indifference to how merit actually plays out. Relegating these false gods like equality to the dustbin of history would be a start.
Surely more and more grow bored with constant hassle about racism? We are all tired of it.
I think Whites are itching for a fight, but liberalism makes ‘who to fight’ very difficult.
I say we start with niggers and jews and see what develops.
What say you?
Lol. That is not my take on things. I also don't believe whites are itching for a fight. We have been domesticated. Although perhaps that is changing.
I think the next phase, so to speak, will be the emergence of realism making many claims against white America nonsensical. The decolonization and all the rest.
I think while Boomers are still around very little will happen.
I think I was not clear. When I say ‘fight’ I mean struggle, both overt and covert. The effort to give more money to Shiloh Hendrix than our enemies did to Karmelo Anthony is indicative, I think, of the ‘fight’ that is in White people.
I don’t think the Boomers are the obstacle you think they are. Most of them are indulgent and more than willing to retreat if confronted with any real opposition.
It’s smug self-satisfaction that results from impunity from the consequence of race-mixing that is our biggest obstacle.
And that kind of thing isn’t really age-bound.
Whites are starting to care about Whites because they are White and the pseudo-politics that have thrived as a parasite on the White Body Politics is either going to change or be plowed under.
I’m sure you saw how ‘conservatives’ and supposedly ‘pro-White’ accounts tried to make the Shiloh Incident into something other than ‘Negro’ vs ‘White’…and failing.
No one who gave money to Shiloh cared if Shiloh was ‘virtuous’ according to ‘conservative values’.
They - rightly - saw arrogant privileged niggers threatening a White woman and child who stood up for herself and her child.
What I saw was 70 years of ‘conservative’ anti-White liberal kumbaya racial politics annihilated in a matter of days.
On X, now without censorship thanks to Elon Musk, out of control violence has become standard fodder for ridicule with blacks typically being the most violent group depicted. Unfortunately, the stereotype of black violence is rooted in reality. Despite being ignored by mainstream media for years, where white people decide to live, shop, vacation and even if they are willing to use public transit has been for decades largely based on avoiding large groups of black people because of their perceived and actual tendency to engage in violence.
Another example of forbidding open discussion just makes life more complex. But real life carries on regardless. People do have to live in the real world where real world things happen. But then again a sizable portion of society seem to get their worldview exclusively from TV.
They probably have an AI tracking the donors so they can round them up and send them to reeducation camps.
It wouldn't surprise me.
It is just a word. I must admit I once feared the saying of it, what's funny to me is that it was black-Canadian, some African and black-American friends who castigated me for years for refusing to say it. I could not as it seemed like I'd be crossing a line (I was a normie and academic at the time).
Yet now I can only think that these are our nations; we ought to be allowed to say what we want, when we want and how we want to.
No one should make us feel as I did; ashamed to say a word. Ours are the most glorious societies on earth, with only Asia rivalling us. Europe built the greatest civilizations, the finest literature and 98% of all inventions. The whole of 'Christendom', the whole of North America, the British Commonwealth, and Europe are ours by right. We're taking them back.
Let us hope this is a turning of the tide. We must take back our rights, our words, our literature and our prior glory.
I agree. Freedom of speech is in our DNA. And growing numbers are becoming aware language has become weaponized, a cowardly way to fight.
The Anglosphere alone towers above all else and must be preserved. It is not for others to trash.
Dans ma vue le Francosphere est plus grand.
Eh bien, l'anglosphère est plus grande, mais peut-être que rien ne peut égaler la France en termes de talent artistique ; nous aimerions tous être français dans ce sens.
Eh oui lol
I agree, either everybody should be allowed to say it or nobody should, it's either a word fit for polite company or not. It can't be both depending upon who is saying it!
Exactement.
There were definite racial problems in the past, but everyone worked so hard to improve them, and by the early 1970's it seemed the whole country was together on this.
There were many all black shows on TV, and they were very popular. It was cool for kids of all races to hang out together. Comedians were making jokes about ethnicity in a good natured way, which of course is forbidden today.
By 2008 we were sure that everything was good, and had no problem electing a black president. Then things changed.
The new president seemed to inject himself into every controversy with an opinion suggesting it was driven by racism. A black professor was arrested when police responded to a call about a break in. Professor Gates had been away in China, and on returning found his door jammed, and had his driver help him force open the door. He accused the police of racism when they arrived, and was arrested for being disorderly after repeated warnings.
The president of the US injected himself worldwide saying "The police acted stupidly". There were many more examples after that, especially with his "Wing man", the attorney general of the US, also a black man, who began his time as the nations top law enforcement by telling us that we had always been cowards about race.
Unfortunately, we have seen the forces of chaos in action since then. Cancel culture, race baiting, PC censorship, sexual degeneracy, absolute trash being taught in schools, and we have a new generation growing up believing this crap.
I'm glad to see people have had enough. This is the kind of abuse that, if not dealt with, can lead to worse abuse or even death.
Laugh at them, ignore them, or tell them off. We've had enough of this nonsense.
I agree. And I believe this is what we witnessed with Hendrix. Whites have bent over backwards and no one else bothers so why are we? That is the next question that will emerge. Why are we doing this?
We have to get control of our culture back. With this new millennium, we have seen the internet and reality TV destroy polite society.
It's a good sign that the first generation to grow up with this, and now being parents, are making moves for smart phones to be removed from schools. We have to balance technology use so that it does not make us degenerate and dumb.
That is a serious worry of mine. The way people become addicted to technology. I see grown adults walking along the street with their phones like zombies. But what would that do to children who grow up using them? Will they ever read a book?
Our enemy is convenience I believe. Technology makes life convenient, so why strive?
We have to learn that tech is like food, you don't want to be a glutton and you certainly don't want a bunch of addictive junk.
"A Somali gentleman filmed and uploaded a video and it soon went viral. You can probably guess the rest."
Yeah, I can guess the rest. And you call him a "gentleman"?
Indeed; a little tongue in cheek. No need to stoop to their level after all. I think most of us appreciate the gall of a foreigner behaving as he did with the express intent of ruining a young woman's life. Although the fund contributors had the last laugh.
Thanks for your response.
"I think most of us appreciate the gall of a foreigner behaving as he did with the express intent of ruining a young woman's life."
Of course, one is free to speak for others on their own page. But I'd be willing to bet that most people, in fact, do not appreaciate "the gall of a foreigner behaving wtih the intent of ruining a young woman's life."
Also, it's possible that the one having the last laugh is the platform that received the contributions. Put bluntly, what if this whole thing was an orchestrated scam to get some quick cash from a gullible public desperate for some kind of "victory"?
Seriously, would it surprise anyone? After all, the hostile elite, and their paid proxies and useful idiots, are all well-practiced scammers. It's what they're all about. Whatever it is - and who can tell? - I like to keep a big bag of salt by my side for things like this.
That is a little too paranoid. It would be a risky proposition for the fund to flirt with racism and racial slurs to skim a modest amount of cash.
I think much of the anger was indeed the idea of an immigrant upbraiding a native.
Ironically, the importation of other groups without any historical reason to feel guilt will be the ones who push it over the edge. They are far less afraid to say what white people can’t say.
Go on popular social media where the midwits and short form content consumers hang out and it is all enormous amounts of black people (mostly women) and pathetic white grovelers making noise about this case and planning their next move to pressure the payment processor to shut the fund down (but not the Karmelo Anthony one. That one they still say “fuck the white boy” and “self defense”)
Others, though, aren’t chiming in yet but they see the double standard as well. The illusion of “people of color” as a group doesn’t work when people actually live together and see what they’re asked to tolerate for sake of “community”. Just like LGBTQ, this BIPOC is an unstable alliance. It will be “B” on one side and “IPOC” on the other.
It all ends when we say enough. At the moment the media will publicize nothing except the approved narrative. So the bubble survives. But real life is intruding more and more given the effects of mass immigration. The midwits will be hit hardest in my view.
I have seen the people you are referring to. I work alongside them. It is all performance.
I don’t think the masses change anything if the ultra wealthy are still funding NGOs and messaging that keeps the charade going.
It ends the very minute the elites decide to stop propping up all the bullshit. The whole white guilt complex and obfuscation against pattern noticing is all elite stuff astroturfing. It only works in a captured media and censorship model with heavy funding to activist groups. Without their paid smoke screens, the noticing becomes impossible to deny.
I agree. It is false. The resources are also drying up and reality is intruding. It was never going to work.
I am of the theory that it is possible to have racial harmony. But it won't be done without facing some hard facts and definitely not by privileging a group and excusing them of any responsibility.
The past is the past, slavery was a stain in our history, but it is done, and besides that, most whites didn't benefit for them, but for a tiny minority.
African blacks sold other blacks in their ports to mostly jewish merchants that in turn sold them to a few rich white landowners in all of the American continents. The other whites had to compete against those rich landlords that counted with the advantage of free labor. And those other whites were the majority of the whites, and thus most of us probably didn't descend from slave owners.
For the blacks now, the hard reality is that their ancestors paid with their work and their blood for their citizenships in the richest and most advanced nation on the earth. And they are not fully either recognizing or enjoying this privilege correctly.
Inner city public schools are a mess not because bad whitey escaped to the suburbs and thus deprived those schools of a vigorous tax base. Inner city schools are a mess because a bunch of black kids act like criminals from an early age, making the life of other black kids hell, making the teacher's lives hell, vandalizing and destroying everything on their path, and nobody can say an iota about it.
Black community leaders spend too much time complaining about a past, a past which most whites living now are not even remotely responsible for. Black leaders instead of denouncing gangsta rappers as the disgusting useless pieces of excrement they are, instead, promote them as role models. Yes, because black leaders sons are going to Yale, it is easy for them to promote filthy for the other blacks who are going to pay the price of a decadent, stupid and asinine culture of thuggery, sexual immorality and violence. It is easy for an Obama to promote the memory of a stupid useless criminal as Tupac when his girls were busy having an European education, learning French and German, with Piano and History of Art private tutors.
For the other black "leaders" like Sharpton or the run-of-the-mill academic activist it is easy to promote degeneration in black culture when they live comfortably isolated from the effects as privileged Manhattanites dispatched by their chauffeurs from one 5th Ave modern art vernissage to a beach weekend in a upscale estate in The Hamptons. Even better if any additional black on black homicide, every single fentanyl overdose, any additional teenage black single mom means more grant moneys for their endless "academic" projects, more useless bureaucratic cushy jobs and more donations from clueless woke heiress foundations.
Sometimes we need to be able to utter a crass word, when this is the only way to shout that the king has no clothes.
I do not share your rosey view. America stands as testament to the failure of multiculturalism. The only way it can work is one group absolutely dominates, and others accept their authority. What we now call multiculturalism has never worked anywhere. It always descends into conflict.
The appropriate view is the one almost everyone on Earth shares; everyone needs their own homeland that is exclusively theirs. They should not have to share it with foreigners.
Has it been proven that the thief is 5 years old?
> white trash
I hate seeing that.
> How many will join them over the next few years?
Those who want their children to live.
The point was not about the behaviour of the young boy. It doesn't matter as the issue is the ruination of people through doxxing etc.
As for white trash; this is their perception of people like Hendrix. A useful thing for us to remember. Many middle class people despise the lower orders. In the US the term white trash sums up their views well.
I'm old enough to remember white people casually using the word nigger and when being a nigger lover could get one in significant trouble. Things have gotten better, but the Left is trying to milk the past and act like the Civil Rights Era didn't happen. They are using the Charles Manson Strategy and it pisses me off to no end.
There are parts of this country where Martin Luther King's Dream is actually happening -- especially in the rural South. I have twice as much house as I could otherwise afford because I live in such a place. I seriously want to do bad things to those Whites who live in the remaining Whitopias race bait bait for political gain.
A bit under a half century ago I figured that the N word would become a badge of honor, much as many other ethnic minorities have treated their gritty past as badges of honor. (See how Conan O'Brien and Seth MacFarlane treat their Irishness in The Simpsons and Family Guy, respectively.) Wokeness has diverted this natural path towards social equality.
A positive shoutout to Aaron McGruder and the rest of the crew of the Boondocks cartoon. They played fair, showing glimpses of the Bad Old Days along side earnest Whites trying to make amends -- along with overly generous uses of the N word. I wish I was rich enough to finance a reboot.
Let's bring back "free, white, and 21."